Andrew Morton writes:Well no, they don't. Multiple people work on things independently and then put their stuff together. Sometimes there are then conflicts that have to be sorted out. That's what merging is all about. No, the git model (and the BK model before it) expresses the reality that there is lots of development going on in parallel in many different places. You'd prefer to be the bunny that keeps every single subsystem's string of patches all bundled together in a single humungous quilt series? With all due respect (and with a sense of admiration at how much patch-wrangling you already do), I don't think you'd scale that far. :) Paul. --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH 18/44 take 2] [UBI] build unit implementation |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Paul Jackson | [PATCH] cpuset sched_load_balance kmalloc fix |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
