On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:13:46 +0000 "Justin Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I compiled the isight_firmware module, and was happy with
>> the result's, "no more udev",
>> This morning I wasn't so lucky, upon a cold boot my system was stuck
>> during boot, I tried numerous boot's but still the same results,
>> luckily I was hoping to gather the info on what was going on here it is:
>>
>> [ 88.517109] firmware: requesting isight.fw
>> [ 88.628451] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at f8dbf000
>> [ 88.628463] IP: [<f8bc90f7>] :isight_firmware:isight_firmware_load+0xf2/0x1c3
>> [ 88.628474] *pde = 375a8067 *pte = 00000000
>> [ 88.628483] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [ 88.628490] Modules linked in: isight_firmware(+) hci_usb
>> cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_performance cpufreq_powersave rfcomm hidp
>> l2cap bluetooth fan ipmi_watchdog ipmi_msghandler uvcvideo uinput
>> wlan_tkip ieee80211_crypt_tkip ieee80211_crypt arpt_mangle
>> arptable_filter arp_tables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack
>> iptable_mangle iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables i2c_i810 i2c_algo_bit
>> coretemp eeprom acpi_cpufreq fglrx(P) agpgart appletouch joydev
>> applesmc wlan_scan_sta firewire_ohci firewire_core ath_rate_sample
>> snd_hda_intel snd_pcm ath_pci ohci1394 snd_timer snd_page_alloc
>> snd_hwdep wlan ieee1394 ath_hal(P) evdev ehci_hcd uhci_hcd pata_acpi
>> button thermal video processor
>> [ 88.628581]
>> [ 88.628587] Pid: 2568, comm: modprobe Tainted: P
>> (2.6.26-rc4-00173-gd53a1a8 #6)
>
> there's the kernel version
>
>> [ 88.628593] EIP: 0060:[<f8bc90f7>] EFLAGS: 00010207 CPU: 0
>> [ 88.628600] EIP is at isight_firmware_load+0xf2/0x1c3 [isight_firmware]
>> [ 88.628606] EAX: f2120150 EBX: 00000032 ECX: 0000000a EDX: c17f5638
>> [ 88.628610] ESI: f8dbf000 EDI: f2120158 EBP: f2111dac ESP: f2111d7c
>> [ 88.628615] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
>> [ 88.628621] Process modprobe (pid: 2568, ti=f2110000 task=f5495380
>> task.ti=f2110000)
>> [ 88.628625] Stack: 00003def f2120150 f5728c90 00000578 f8dbeff8
>> c02b3854 f5728ff8 00006743
>> [ 88.628640] f492c700 f571ef50 f8bc97c4 f8bc9750 f2111dc8
>> c02b42d4 f5728c90 00000000
>> [ 88.628654] f571ef6c 00000000 f8bc9790 f2111ddc c026e58e
>> f571ef6c f571f054 f8bc9790
>> [ 88.628667] Call Trace:
>> [ 88.628676] [<c02b3854>] ? usb_autopm_do_device+0xb1/0xb9
>> [ 88.628694] [<c02b42d4>] ? usb_probe_interface+0xc0/0xee
>> [ 88.628707] [<c026e58e>] ? driver_probe_device+0xa0/0x11b
>> [ 88.628720] [<c026e646>] ? __driver_attach+0x3d/0x5f
>> [ 88.628731] [<c026ddea>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x3b/0x5d
>> [ 88.628744] [<c026e425>] ? driver_attach+0x14/0x16
>> [ 88.628753] [<c026e609>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x5f
>> [ 88.628762] [<c026e180>] ? bus_add_driver+0x9a/0x1aa
>> [ 88.628775] [<c026e7c3>] ? driver_register+0x71/0xcd
>> [ 88.628783] [<c016427e>] ? __vunmap+0x93/0x9b
>> [ 88.628797] [<c02b3f01>] ? usb_register_driver+0x71/0xcb
>> [ 88.628808] [<f8be6017>] ? isight_firmware_init+0x17/0x19 [isight_firmware]
>> [ 88.628818] [<c0140d4a>] ? sys_init_module+0x163c/0x17ea
>> [ 88.628835] [<c020fe2e>] ? prio_tree_insert+0x1c/0x1cb
>> [ 88.628854] [<c0160f21>] ? vma_link+0xc0/0xce
>> [ 88.628866] [<c0161597>] ? mmap_region+0x2ca/0x377
>> [ 88.628877] [<c016ec1c>] ? __kmalloc+0x0/0xdb
>> [ 88.628905] [<c01038fa>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>> [ 88.628925] =======================
>> [ 88.628928] Code: e9 8e 00 00 00 83 7d d0 32 bb 32 00 00 00 0f 4e
>> 5d d0 ba d0 00 00 00 89 d8 e8 32 5b 5a c7 89 d9 8b 75 e0 c1 e9 02 89
>> 45 d4 89 c7 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 8b 45 d8 b9 a0 00 00 00
>> 8b 10
>> [ 88.629002] EIP: [<f8bc90f7>] isight_firmware_load+0xf2/0x1c3
>> [isight_firmware] SS:ESP 0068:f2111d7c
>> [ 88.629015] ---[ end trace 0d6c893753a1cd98 ]---
>>
>> like I said yesterday there was no problem at all, maybe because the
>> system was warm from being on all day.
>> after renaming isight_firmware.ko so I can boot up the system runs fine.
>> hope this helps in the kernel development.
>> regards;
>
> I get this:
>
> y:/usr/src/25> AFLAGS=--32 /bin/sh scripts/decodecode < ~/x
> Code: e9 8e 00 00 00 83 7d d0 32 bb 32 00 00 00 0f 4e 5d d0 ba d0 00 00 00 89 d8 e8 32 5b 5a c7 89 d9 8b 75 e0 c1 e9 02 89 45 d4 89 c7 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 8b 45 d8 b9 a0 00 00 00 8b 10
>
> /tmp/tmp.QXepc15200.o: file format elf32-i386
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <.text>:
> 0: e9 8e 00 00 00 jmp 0x93
> 5: 83 7d d0 32 cmpl __PLACEHOLDER__0_x32,-0x30(%ebp)
> 9: bb 32 00 00 00 mov __PLACEHOLDER__0_x32,%ebx
> e: 0f 4e 5d d0 cmovle -0x30(%ebp),%ebx
> 12: ba d0 00 00 00 mov __PLACEHOLDER__0_xd0,%edx
> 17: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax
> 19: e8 32 5b 5a c7 call 0xc75a5b50
> 1e: 89 d9 mov %ebx,%ecx
> 20: 8b 75 e0 mov -0x20(%ebp),%esi
> 23: c1 e9 02 shr __PLACEHOLDER__0_x2,%ecx
> 26: 89 45 d4 mov %eax,-0x2c(%ebp)
> 29: 89 c7 mov %eax,%edi
>
> /tmp/tmp.QXepc15200.o: file format elf32-i386
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <.text>:
> 0: f3 a5 rep movsl %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi)
> 2: 89 d9 mov %ebx,%ecx
> 4: 83 e1 03 and __PLACEHOLDER__0_x3,%ecx
> 7: 74 02 je 0xb
> 9: f3 a4 rep movsb %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi)
> b: 8b 45 d8 mov -0x28(%ebp),%eax
> e: b9 a0 00 00 00 mov __PLACEHOLDER__0_xa0,%ecx
> 13: 8b 10 mov (%eax),%edx
>
>
> So at a guess I'd say that firnware->data is garbage (esi=f8dbf000).
> But I didn't try very hard.
>
> btw,
>
> : static int isight_firmware_load(struct usb_interface *intf,
> : const struct usb_device_id *id)
> : {
> : struct usb_device *dev = interface_to_usbdev(intf);
> : int llen, len, req, ret = 0;
> : const struct firmware *firmware;
> : unsigned char *buf;
> : unsigned char data[4];
> : const u8 *ptr;
> :
> : if (request_firmware(&firmware, "isight.fw", &dev->dev) != 0) {
> : printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to load isight firmware\n");
> : return -ENODEV;
> : }
> :
> : ptr = firmware->data;
> :
> : if (usb_control_msg
> : (dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(dev, 0), 0xa0, 0x40, 0xe600, 0, "", 1,
> : 300) != 1) {
> : printk(KERN_ERR
> : "Failed to initialise isight firmware loader\n");
> : ret = -ENODEV;
> : goto out;
> : }
> :
> : while (1) {
> : memcpy(data, ptr, 4);
> : len = (data[0] << 8 | data[1]);
> : req = (data[2] << 8 | data[3]);
> : ptr += 4;
> :
> : if (len == 0x8001)
> : break; /* success */
> : else if (len == 0)
> : continue;
>
> This looks like it can overrun the buffer and go oops if we were given
> unexpected data.
>
>
> : for (; len > 0; req += 50) {
> : llen = len > 50 ? 50 : len;
>
> min()
>
> : len -= llen;
> :
> : buf = kmalloc(llen, GFP_KERNEL);
> : memcpy(buf, ptr, llen);
> :
> : ptr += llen;
> :
> : if (usb_control_msg
> : (dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(dev, 0), 0xa0, 0x40, req, 0,
> : buf, llen, 300) != llen) {
> : printk(KERN_ERR
> : "Failed to load isight firmware\n");
> : kfree(buf);
> : ret = -ENODEV;
> : goto out;
> : }
> :
> : kfree(buf);
>
> Could just kmalloc a single 50-byte buffer and then reuse it multiple times.
>
> : }
> : }
> : if (usb_control_msg
> : (dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(dev, 0), 0xa0, 0x40, 0xe600, 0, "__PLACEHOLDER__0_", 1,
> : 300) != 1) {
> : printk(KERN_ERR "isight firmware loading completion failed\n");
> : ret = -ENODEV;
> : }
> : out:
> : release_firmware(firmware);
> : return ret;
> : }
>
>
I really don't know what happen'd, after compiling this module into
the kernel; everything was good, even a reboot was fine, then
leaving the system off, for 8+hrs, and then turning the system on
caused this bug, FWIW I did notice ift-load having issues during a
cold boot
loading /lib/firmware/isight.fw but, then again; only noticed ussually
upon a recompile of the kernel.(honeslty it's so inconsistent, I
really can't decipher if it's after a recompile of the kernel or a
cold boot, but I know it happens, and I'll let you know when it does).
Anyway I'll try and catch the ift-load issue, as well as try and
recompile isight-firmware to see what might be happeing.
regards;
--
Justin P. Mattock
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Messages in current thread:
Re: [ 88.628451] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request... , Justin Mattock , (Fri Jun 6, 4:37 am)
