On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 12:14 -0400, Thomas Tuttle wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I got that, I'm just mathematically impaired this morning. Read
> > that as "when someone tries to do a *20* byte read, do a 16-byte read.."
> > In other words, round down to the nearest multiple of 8.
> 
> Oh.  I would seriously question doing that, because it would allow
> reads that are improperly split up to fail silently.  What happens if
> someone tries to read 40 bytes, and (for some reason) it gets split
> into two 20-byte reads?  Instead of "12345" they'll get "12.34."
> (where . is 4 zero or garbage bytes).  I'd rather they get an error.

I suppose you're right, people usually don't check those return codes.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/