On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
quoted text
>  
>  	for (i = 0; (res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i)); i++) {
> -		if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
> +		if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET ||
> +		    res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
>  			continue;

Umm. If I was a compiler, I'd be warning about this. You don't get a 
warning about suggesting parentheses around the '&'?

Also, regardless of lack of warnings, the natural way to do this is to 
just say

	if (res->flags & (IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET))
		continue;

which is what any sane compiler would rewrite it to anyway, but since it's 
not just more readable for computers, but for humans too, why not do it 
that way?

			Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/