Re: [PATCH 4/4] per-task-delay-accounting: /proc export for memory reclaim delay

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Cc: <kobayashi.kk@...>, <kosaki.motohiro@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 6:41 pm

On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:07:29 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:


Any application which breaks if we add more things to /proc/pid/stat
just needs to be fixed.

But we can't add new fields in the middle of the line!  We can only add
new items to the end.

But I think it would be good if we just weren't to make this change. 
Do we really want to keep reporting the same information in two
separate ways?

If so, a new /proc/pid/delays would be a better way, but it might be a
bit late for doing that now, given that we already put
delayacct_blkio_ticks into /proc/pid/stat.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 4/4] per-task-delay-accounting: /proc export for ..., Andrew Morton, (Wed Jun 4, 6:41 pm)