Hi Eric, On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:24:37 +0200, Éric Piel wrote:If you didn't receive any answer, my guess is that it's because you're trying to add this driver to the wrong tree. Why would this driver go in drivers/hwmon and be reviewed by hwmon folks, when it doesn't expose a single hwmon attribute to user-space? I guess you thought putting the driver there would be fine because that's where the hdaps and ams drivers are, but IMHO the hdaps and ams drivers should never have been placed in drivers/hwmon. These devices really aren't hardware monitoring chips is the traditional sense of the term. They are different chips, serving different purposes and deserving a totally different interface. They'd better live in a different subsystem and be maintainer by a different crew with interest in these devices and hardware to test the drivers. This discussion thread might sched some light on a possible approach: http://marc.info/?l=lm-sensors&m=121127824726050&w=2 So my advice is that you don't wait for a review from the hwmon people, because apparently we don't have much interest in this type of device, so you'll be waiting forever. You're much better adding the mdps driver to drivers/misc through Andrew Morton, at least until someone takes care of creating a subsystem for this type of devices and move all existing drivers there. Would someone object to moving the hdaps and ams (and possibly applesmc) drivers to drivers/misc? -- Jean Delvare --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
