Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 1:25 pm

Hi,

Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:


Oh, that should go out, sorry.  It is a left-over from another way to do
it.  Should pay more attention :/


Hm, just to make sure: this is the patch that breaks booting, right?  If
you apply all patches in the series before this one, the machine boots
fine?

Could you boot a working image with bootmem_debug in the command line?
Perhaps seeing the usual bootmem usage on this box gives a hint what is
broken.


Okay, I will make them more clear.


Yes, that too.  I would also rename last_offset to last_eidx and
last_success to last_sidx.  What do you think?

	Hannes
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Johannes Weiner, (Mon Jun 2, 5:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Yasunori Goto, (Tue Jun 3, 6:59 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Johannes Weiner, (Tue Jun 3, 9:16 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Yasunori Goto, (Wed Jun 4, 3:55 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Johannes Weiner, (Wed Jun 4, 1:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Yasunori Goto, (Wed Jun 4, 7:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Johannes Weiner, (Wed Jun 4, 9:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Yasunori Goto, (Thu Jun 5, 1:31 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Johannes Weiner, (Thu Jun 5, 9:41 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 11/14] bootmem: respect goal more likely, Yasunori Goto, (Thu Jun 5, 5:25 pm)