Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Jackson
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 12:37 pm

> btw Are you guys using some kind of castrated, statically linked shell to run

It (that init= program) is not a script.  It is its own
castrated, statically linked special purpose binary.
Once it has done its duty setting up cpusets, it then
exec's the normal init, confined to the cpuset configured
for it.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot optio ..., Paul Jackson, (Wed Jun 4, 12:37 pm)