Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Jackson
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 11:58 am

Max wrote:

That can ensure that the deamons that init starts later
on placed, but it doesn't ensure that the glibc pages that
init (and the shell it spawned to run 'create_cpusets')
are placed.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot optio ..., Paul Jackson, (Wed Jun 4, 11:58 am)