Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <mgross@...>, <linux-scsi@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 12:56 pm

FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:

I think using the bitmap is an excellent idea and your numbers look good. 
Do you have numbers on the memory consumption too?
Trading some memory for performance is ok for something as performance critical 
as the IOMMU. 

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances, FUJITA Tomonori, (Wed Jun 4, 10:47 am)
Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances, FUJITA Tomonori, (Fri Jun 6, 12:44 am)
Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu Jun 5, 10:49 am)
Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances, FUJITA Tomonori, (Fri Jun 6, 12:44 am)
Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances, Andi Kleen, (Wed Jun 4, 12:56 pm)
Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances, FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu Jun 5, 10:49 am)