Re: [PATCH 0/8 v4] mpc83xx_wdt rework, support for mpc8610 and mpc8xx

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <sfr@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linuxppc-dev@...>, <wim@...>, <scottwood@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 8:27 am

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:

I found original email.. yes, you indeed ask for [POWERPC] in git
trees.

But. I believe anyone who send patches, tries to mimic existing practice,
and thus please the maintainer. Personally, I'm doing git log subsystem/
and looking for the preferred format for the commit message. And I'm not
alone: linuxppc-dev is full of [POWERPC] in the patch subjects, despite
the fact that you didn't explicitly ask for it.

Asking to send patches with "subsystem: " and then seeing them as
"[SUBSYSTEM] " in git-log is more confusing. Since new authors will
personalize this thinking: "Oh, maintainer fixed my negligence.
Next time I should send a patch with [SUBSYSTEM]".

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -mm] watchdog: mpc8xxx_wdt: fix build, Anton Vorontsov, (Sat Jun 7, 1:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8 v4] mpc83xx_wdt rework, support for mpc8610 a..., Anton Vorontsov, (Wed Jun 4, 8:27 am)
[PATCH 7/8] [POWERPC] fsl_soc: remove mpc83xx_wdt code, Anton Vorontsov, (Mon Jun 2, 1:38 pm)
[PATCH 4/8] [WATCHDOG] mpc83xx_wdt: rename to mpc8xxx_wdt, Anton Vorontsov, (Mon Jun 2, 1:38 pm)
[PATCH 1/8] [WATCHDOG] mpc83xx_wdt: fix checkpatch issues, Anton Vorontsov, (Mon Jun 2, 1:38 pm)