On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:07:20PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:I found original email.. yes, you indeed ask for [POWERPC] in git trees. But. I believe anyone who send patches, tries to mimic existing practice, and thus please the maintainer. Personally, I'm doing git log subsystem/ and looking for the preferred format for the commit message. And I'm not alone: linuxppc-dev is full of [POWERPC] in the patch subjects, despite the fact that you didn't explicitly ask for it. Asking to send patches with "subsystem: " and then seeing them as "[SUBSYSTEM] " in git-log is more confusing. Since new authors will personalize this thinking: "Oh, maintainer fixed my negligence. Next time I should send a patch with [SUBSYSTEM]". -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Christian Kujau | 2.6.20.4: NETDEV WATCHDOG and lockups |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jack Steiner | Re: [patch] my mmu notifiers |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | removing VOPs |
| Lennart Augustsson | Re: FreeBSD 5/6/7 kernel emulator for NetBSD 2.x |
| Daniel Carosone | Re: direct I/O |
| Brian Buhrow | Re: /sbin/reboot and secmodel |
