On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:37:25 -0500
Tom Tucker <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Oof, yeah...good point...
Another option might be to keep the nfsd that issued the RDMA_READ idle
for a short time in the expectation that the RDMA_READ reply will come
in soon. With a large enough pool of nfsd's I'd think that wouldn't
cause too much of a problem. That might be easier to implement anyway,
though we'd still have to think about how best to make sure that we
dispatch the RDMA_READ reply to the right nfsd (or at least to the
right svc pool).
Right, it's certainly no worse than the current situation for the
Jeff Layton <email@example.com>