Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: pm-suspend/17334

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <kvm@...>, <avi@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 7:13 am

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:


True. However in Zdenek's case, interrupts/preemption gets enabled 
somewhere during the resume, which correctly triggers the warning.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] ..., Jiri Kosina, (Wed Jun 4, 7:13 am)