On Wednesday 04 June 2008 07:44, Trent Piepho wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

quoted text
> > I don't understand why you keep talking about DMA.  Are you talking
> > about ordering between readX() and DMA?  PCI proides those guarantees.
>
> I guess you haven't been reading the whole thread.  The reason it started
> was because gcc can re-order powerpc (and everyone else's too) IO accesses
> vs accesses to cachable memory (but not spin-locks), which ends up only
> being a problem with coherent DMA.

I don't think it is only a problem with coherent DMA.

CPU0                         CPU1
mutex_lock(mutex);
writel(something, DATA_REG);
writel(GO, CTRL_REG);
started = 1;
mutex_unlock(mutex);
                             mutex_lock(mutex);
                             if (started)
                               /* oops, this can reach device before GO */
                               writel(STOP, CTRL_REG);
                               
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/