Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask()

on 2008-6-4 8:55 Li Zefan wrote:

quoted text

> Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800 >> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> >>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be >>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE >>> offline/online. >> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexiste... >> >> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense. ie: that >> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix. >> > > They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in > the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring. >

Right. I will modify my patches. --

unsubscribe notice

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


linux-kernel:
Amit K. Arora	[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
H. Peter Anvin	Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Nicolas Pitre	Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb()
Bart Van Assche	Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Natalie Protasevich	[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask()

Online users