Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jared Hulbert
Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 - 6:14 pm

> the alternate technologies that I have heard about are either _far_ less

I will agree with this.


I don't agree with this one.   Erase blocks don't automatically
disqualify a memory as a fit into a flat addressed arch.   You need to
play games at the memory management layer to make it work, but it's
not impossible.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Rick van Rein, (Mon Jun 2, 5:59 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, david, (Mon Jun 2, 10:02 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Daniel Barkalow, (Mon Jun 2, 12:30 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 2, 1:04 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Rick van Rein, (Mon Jun 2, 2:10 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 2, 5:51 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Stefan Richter, (Tue Jun 3, 7:27 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Pavel Machek, (Tue Jun 3, 9:12 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Jared Hulbert, (Tue Jun 3, 6:14 pm)