Re: utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...>
Cc: <mtk.manpages@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <hch@...>, <miklos@...>, <viro@...>, <jamie@...>, <drepper@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <subrata@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 - 4:22 pm

On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:13:58 +0200
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> wrote:


Well I think it would have been better, really.

Right now someone (apparently me) needs to take the text from
"utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (overview)" and weave it
together with the text from "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes
[v4] (patch)" to produce a vaguely coherent changelog.

It all would be much saner and cleaner if each of these changes was in
a self-contained diff which had its own standalone changelog, no?

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch), Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Jun 3, 4:13 pm)
Re: utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch), Andrew Morton, (Tue Jun 3, 4:22 pm)
Re: utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch), Michael Kerrisk, (Tue Jun 3, 4:29 pm)