[PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...>
Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 - 3:02 pm

We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.

Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c	2008-04-14 10:44:33.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c	2008-05-13 11:37:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
  * Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
  * SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
  */
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))
 
 /* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
 #define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH, Jeff Dike, (Tue Jun 3, 3:02 pm)