On 6/3/08, akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
>
>  The patch titled
>      x86: implement pte_special
>  has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
>      x86-implement-pte_special.patch

...

quoted text
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Subject: x86: implement pte_special
>  From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
>
>  Implement the pte_special bit for x86.  This is required to support
>  lockless get_user_pages, because we need to know whether or not we can
>  refcount a particular page given only its pte (and no vma).

Wait... what the heck is a "special" page? Isn't that a terrible name
for _anything_? Or is there a tradition to the name? It sounds like it
should be named "novma" or "autonomous" or something instead.
Something that carries at least a little more information than
"special". Where can I find the documentation for this bit?

Has this been discussed on LKML? Is the name a result of consensus or whim?

Help! :-)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/