On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> > > ...setsockopt(listenfd, SOL_TCP, TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, &val, 
> > > sizeof(val)) seems to be the magic trick that is interestion here.
> > 
> > seems to be used:
> > 
> >  22003 write(3, "distccd[22003] (dcc_listen_by_ad"..., 62) = 62
> >  22003 listen(4, 10)                     = 0
> >  22003 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT, [1], 4) = 0
> > 
> > i'll queue up your reverts for testing in -tip.
> 
> update: your 3 reverts in tip/out-of-tree [commit dad98991c] definitely 
> fixed the hangs!
> 
> Here is the testing i did:


hm.

Here's a theory - the DA code put the socket in the accept queue after
data has been queued on the socket, instead of the other way around
which is normal.

Could this be confusing the select() mechanism?

-Pat








--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/