Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stefan Richter
Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 - 7:27 am

Andi Kleen wrote:

Several bus subsystems actually probe asynchronously (i.e. in parallel
to other bus subsystems) or even with some degree of internal parallelism.

Of course there are notable benefits in this only if the devices are
very slow to start up --- e.g. because they contain moving parts (this
kind of devices is not present in Rick's setup) or because they are
connected via high latency interconnects --- or if there is a massive
number of devices.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -==- ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Rick van Rein, (Mon Jun 2, 5:59 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, david, (Mon Jun 2, 10:02 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Daniel Barkalow, (Mon Jun 2, 12:30 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 2, 1:04 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Rick van Rein, (Mon Jun 2, 2:10 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 2, 5:51 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Stefan Richter, (Tue Jun 3, 7:27 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Pavel Machek, (Tue Jun 3, 9:12 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Jared Hulbert, (Tue Jun 3, 6:14 pm)