On 03-06-08 02:03, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text > On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:58:42 +0200
> Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> wrote:
>
>> On 03-06-08 01:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> This broke
>>> pnp-replace-pnp_resource_table-with-dynamically-allocated-resources.patch:
>> I expect the patch was meant solely for 2.6.26...
>
> Sure. When this patch
> (pnp-mark-resources-that-conflict-with-pci-devices-disabled.patch) is
> applied to 2.6.26, the for-2.6.27
> pnp-replace-pnp_resource_table-with-dynamically-allocated-resources.patch
> broke, as I described here.
Err, yes, got them mixed up. There are just so many of them -- after .27
Bjorn will have basically rewritten all of PnP...
quoted text >> Bjorn, before you repost the option series due to this, wait a minute.
>> Am now looking at/testing 14/15 and see some stuff that needs changing
>> as well.
>
> "the option series" == "PNP: convert resource options to unified
> dynamic list, v1".
>
> I haven't got onto that yet. Strategic lagginess is working out
> nicely.
My bloody ISA test machine decided to up and die on me during a BIOS
flash. I'm sitting right smack in the middle of huge heap of old ISA
gunk hardware, cases and motherboards here -- and now I have to try and
dig out my bed ... :-(
Rene.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: 53052feb6 (PNP: remove pnp_mem_flags() as an lvalue) b ... , Rene Herman , (Mon Jun 2, 5:31 pm)