Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> writes:

quoted text
>> --- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_fr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_fr.c
>> @@ -1008,6 +1008,7 @@ static int fr_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  		stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
>>  		if (pvc->state.becn)
>>  			stats->rx_compressed++;
>> +		skb->dev = dev;
>>  		netif_rx(skb);
>>  		return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
>>  	} else {
>
> Better to use netdev_alloc_skb for receive buffers instead.
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_fr.c	2008-06-29 13:02:42.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_fr.c	2008-06-29 13:04:01.000000000 -0700
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static void fr_lmi_send(struct net_devic
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	skb = dev_alloc_skb(len);
> +	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, len);
>  	if (!skb) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Memory squeeze on fr_lmi_send()\n",
>  		       dev->name);

Well, no, that's another story - the missing assignment is in fr_rx(),
in the regular receive path (similar to 802.1q case, ethX ->
ethX.VLAN_ID transition). I.e., we get incoming packet from a hardware
driver, with skb->dev pointing to hardware hdlcX device, and we change
it to point to a logical pvcX device.

fr_lmi_send() is for control messages (generated locally) only, in TX
path. IOW we alloc skb and send it through hw driver immediately. Not
related to the bug.

That said, perhaps I should indeed use netdev_alloc_skb() for those
control messages? Or is it RX-only?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/