* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not really sure to whom this goes. It seems that the original code 
> came through the x86 tree, although the code itself seems to be 
> entirely generic.

given that i've written the generic stacktrace code for lockdep, i guess 
it comes to me - the only question would be into which branch ;-)

fortunately there's already a tip/core/stacktrace topic, hosting a 
change for you as well:

 Ingo Molnar (1):
       debugging: make stacktrace independent from DEBUG_KERNEL

 Johannes Berg (1):
       stacktrace: don't crash on invalid stack trace structs

 Vegard Nossum (1):
       stacktrace: print_stack_trace() cleanup

i'll queue this one up there.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/