KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
quoted text
> Hi
> 
> 
>>Advantages:
>>
>>* Enterprise workloads on large hardware configurations may need
>>  aggressive consolidation strategy
>>* Performance impact on server is different from desktop or laptops.
>>  Interactivity is less of a concern on large enterprise servers while
>>  workload response times and performance per watt is more significant
>>* Aggressive power savings even with marginal performance penalty is
>>  is a useful tunable for servers since it may provide good
>>  performance-per-watt at low utilisation
>>* This tunable can influence other parts of scheduler like wakeup
>>  biasing for overall task consolidation  
> 
> 
> I'd like to know how many saving power.
> if there are only small saving, I think this is not interesting feature.
> 
> Do you expect how many percentage saving?
> 

An experiment using DVFS on Xeon yeilded a 15-watt allowable reduction
even under running a considerable TPC-W workload.  Lesser loads allowed
a 40-watt (out of 160) reduction.  

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown            | Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto      | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@sun.com                 |                      -- Mark Twain
(905) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800) 555-9786 x56583
bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191#
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/