Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Friday, June 27, 2008 - 1:06 am

Peter Zijlstra wrote:


You could always force socket power saving mode to off globally too if
you don't want it at all.


Ok distcc is a special case, but it doesn't apply to a lot of other
processes (do you really want your CPU to crank up for "updatedb" or
beagle or some backup job for example?)

Perhaps there should be a way to express this in priorities?
"I am low priority, but want to be work conserving if the system
is idle"

The group scheduler is changing the semantics of nice completely
anyways, so so more changes could be applied.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Wed Jun 25, 12:11 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Thu Jun 26, 6:49 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Dipankar Sarma, (Thu Jun 26, 8:01 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Balbir Singh, (Thu Jun 26, 8:01 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Thu Jun 26, 11:08 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Thu Jun 26, 11:31 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Thu Jun 26, 11:52 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, David Collier-Brown, (Thu Jun 26, 12:37 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Thu Jun 26, 1:17 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Dipankar Sarma, (Thu Jun 26, 2:00 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Thu Jun 26, 2:37 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 26, 2:43 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Thu Jun 26, 3:38 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Balbir Singh, (Thu Jun 26, 9:15 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Dipankar Sarma, (Thu Jun 26, 9:54 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Thu Jun 26, 11:24 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Thu Jun 26, 11:50 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Fri Jun 27, 12:19 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Jun 27, 12:51 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jun 27, 1:03 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Fri Jun 27, 1:06 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Fri Jun 27, 1:08 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Fri Jun 27, 1:50 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, David Collier-Brown, (Fri Jun 27, 5:54 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Tim Connors, (Sat Jun 28, 4:22 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Tim Connors, (Sat Jun 28, 4:35 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jun 28, 4:55 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Matthew Garrett, (Sat Jun 28, 5:22 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Sat Jun 28, 5:36 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Matthew Garrett, (Sat Jun 28, 5:53 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, David Collier-Brown, (Sun Jun 29, 11:02 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan, (Sun Jun 29, 9:57 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Tim Connors, (Sun Jun 29, 10:55 pm)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, David Collier-Brown, (Mon Jun 30, 7:18 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 30, 7:31 am)
Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n, Dipankar Sarma, (Mon Jun 30, 9:10 am)