--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Joe Peterson <joe@skyrush.com> wrote:Oops, didn't mean to... Very sorry. Thinking more about my hack (dates back to at least Aug.2005, if not before -- can't find older code I ran), originally I wanted to be able to allow the user to specify the timezone/ offset -- for example, if you were, hypothetically, to visit me where I am now, and your camera had been set to your local time, there's no way I'd easily be seeing the correct times. Fortunately, I began to think better of it after realizing how much work and bother it would be, and decided that if my friends were to be giving me USB sticks and whatnot to mount that weren't with UTC timestamps or in my local timezone, then they weren't going to remain my friends for much longer. Unless they meant to give me those sticks without expecting them back, in which case I'd compromise and let them remain my friends just to see what else they might have up their sleeves to give me. Agreed. And technically UTC is correct. And while for you, the difference between UTC and GMT by now would be the difference between a probe floating gently down to the surface of the sun (oops, make that some planet) or embedding itself a metre or two under the surface, for too many casual users, GMT and UTC are interchangeable. In the case of my camera, technically it's drifted to something that's neither UTC or GMT. If this notebook doesn't get it's NTP sync from my other machine's radio clock, it rapidly becomes far removed from either. Unfortunately, even the Linux filesystem codes are either careless about referring to GMT (I too am guilty, rereading the comment to explain my hack which I wrote, before I decided to add `gmt' as an inaccurate alternative), or are indeed accurate and some filesystems are in fact based on GMT, not UTC -- I don't wish to know. I see some 35-odd references to GMT in the fs/*/* files, try a grep just for, well, to see whether people are as careful with UTC/GMT as they should be. And it's even worse in the next timezone over from me -- I've seen websites referring to broadcasts in GMT -- no, they are in *local* *British* time, whether summer or winter time. Arrgh. NURSE! As it's a new option, no need to cater to (or encourage) inaccurate usage. I'd rather advocate and see compatibility in userspace utilities for my BSD-afflicted brain, like `mount -u' == `mount -o remount -o rw' and `patch -C' == `patch --dry-run', but that's off-topic, as is this whole discussion. Blacklist this e-mail, please? Anyway, thanks for trying to get this patch (probably 3 1/2 years old by me, if I find my oldest source) into the kernel, and I'll shut up now. barry bouwsma --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| David Chinner | Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md. |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
