Re: [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Brownell
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - 4:04 pm

On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

What's a "long period"?

RTCs that connect using I2C or SPI will need to queue for access to
that particular serial bus, and then there are transfer costs.
The busses are frequently, but of course not always, idle.  For I2C
at 100 KHz, RTC transfers might take a millisecond or so.

I'd be tempted to say those are all quick enough that the ops don't
need to be interruptible.

- Dave
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), David Brownell, (Sun Jun 22, 7:55 pm)
Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), Alessandro Zummo, (Wed Jun 25, 1:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), Alan Cox, (Wed Jun 25, 3:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), Jonathan Corbet, (Wed Jun 25, 3:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), David Brownell, (Wed Jun 25, 3:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), David Brownell, (Wed Jun 25, 4:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rtc: remove BKL for ioctl(), Jonathan Corbet, (Wed Jun 25, 4:41 pm)