* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> Hi,
> 
> Ingo, can you please drop the "softirq softlockup debugging" patch and 
> apply this instead? This much, much prettier, reuses existing 
> debugging infrastructure, and is a lot more generic.

applied to tip/core/softlockup, thanks Vegard.

quoted text
> (Compile tested on allyesconfig, allnoconfig, allnoconfig + softlockup 
> debugging.)

hm, that must have taken quite some time to do on your desktop, right?

FYI, there's no mandatory need to go through that buerocratic testing 
hassle with patches submitted to -tip - especially with small patches 
that look obvious and have a high chance of being right. We do non-stop 
allyes/allno/allmod+randconfig 64-bit/32-bit build and boot testing for 
every single patch added to the repository.

Building, booting and testing it in the environment where you expect it 
to be used primarily should be more than enough.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/