On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:
quoted text
> 
> I'd be inclined instead to use "%P" for symbolic addrs.

That doesn't work - gcc warns about it.

That turns out to be a problem with %#p too. 

It's really irritating how we cannot extend on the printk strings without 
either having to throw out gcc warnings altogether. gcc has no extension 
mechanism to the built-in rules ;/

The format warnings are too useful to drop entirely. I guess sparse could 
be taught to do them, and then we could drop the gcc support for them. But 
that would still limit coverage a _lot_.

		Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/