Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: <hpa@...>, <yhlu.kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <steiner@...>, <travis@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ying.huang@...>, <andi@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 - 11:08 pm

Linus wrote:

I don't see any such uses, so that could work.

I agree - that the lib/vsprintf.c code seems to prefix
"%#p" numbers with "0x", as currently coded.

But I find borrowing the '#' flag for symbolic names
to be a slight stretch, as well as likely to confuse
some of us, such as myself, for whom these printf flags
are already a tad cryptic and error prone.

I'd be inclined instead to use "%P" for symbolic addrs.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Jun 24, 11:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not d..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Mon Jun 30, 3:58 am)
[PATCH 2/5 v2] x86 boot: x86_64 efi compiler warning fix, Paul Jackson, (Sun Jun 22, 10:22 am)
[PATCH 1/5 v2] x86 boot: e820 code indentation fix, Paul Jackson, (Sun Jun 22, 10:21 am)