> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:18:09PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> XFS shows 2 build problems today.
>>
>> 1. xfs_stats.h problem
>>
>> CC fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o
>> In file included from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:91,
>> from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs.h:44,
>> from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c:18:
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h: In function 'xfs_init_procfs':
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h:150: error: expected ';' before '}' token
>> make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o] Error 1
>
> This will be a !CONFIG_PROC_FS change.
>
> Lachlan/Niv - This is the guilty party:
>
>
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/xfs-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e0fe783155e4f1c7106...
>
> The commit log is:
>
> [XFS]
>
> SGI-PV: 111111
> SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31210a
>
> Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
> ---
>
> What the hell happened here? Where's the commit title, description
> so this can be tracked back to a real patch? That PV# is also bogus....
>
> I suspect that it is this patch:
>
>
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00322.html
>
> Which means that the Signed-Off-By list is incorrect as well as the original
> patch came from Christoph. This can't go to mainline like this - the commit log
> needs to be fixed up.