Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <steiner@...>, <travis@...>, <hpa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ying.huang@...>, <andi@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 - 9:32 pm

Yinghai wrote:

Aha - you're right!

I just earned the Ugly Patch of the Day Award.

I think changes of "%lu" to "0x%lx" are still ok,
but changes of "%8lu" to "0x%8lx" (which use 8
columns, right aligned, space filled format) are
not ok.

I will redo this patch, without the "0x" prefix
on the space filled fields.  Let me know if that
is better.

Thank-you.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not d..., Paul Jackson, (Tue Jun 24, 9:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not d..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Mon Jun 30, 3:58 am)
[PATCH 2/5 v2] x86 boot: x86_64 efi compiler warning fix, Paul Jackson, (Sun Jun 22, 10:22 am)
[PATCH 1/5 v2] x86 boot: e820 code indentation fix, Paul Jackson, (Sun Jun 22, 10:21 am)