Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...>
Cc: Ryan Hope <rmh3093@...>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>, <linux-mm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 7:48 pm

Nick Piggin wrote:

I have been running and testing -mm with reiser4 for a couple years now.
 I haven't been able to run -mm recently because I've been hitting the
copy_user bug Linus fixed for AMD64 but Andrew hasn't updated yet (no
complaints, Andrew) and I'm too lazy to manually patch.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 19, 4:12 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Jun 22, 11:07 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Zan Lynx, (Mon Jun 23, 7:48 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Jun 23, 9:05 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Jun 24, 11:32 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Jun 24, 12:12 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Jun 18, 5:28 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Jun 19, 8:05 pm)