Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...>, Tim Mann <mann@...>, Zach Amsden <zach@...>, Sahil Rihan <srihan@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 7:34 pm

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:21 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:

calibrate_delay_direct was using some variables with "tsc" as the prefix
(tsc_rate_min/max) ...so i thought of using lpj_tsc. And also IMO,
lpj_tsc explains how is this variable initialized. But thinking about
it, maybe we should rename it to "lpj_timer" ?

Also, i still haven't got to testing today's tip tree in my environment,
will let you know as soon as i have done it. 

Thanks,
Alok

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculat..., Alok Kataria, (Mon Jun 23, 7:34 pm)