On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
quoted text >
> * Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
>>
>> This adds to the already default CONFIG_E1000=y in these files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig | 1 +
>> arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 1 +
>
> that is not an e1000 patch but an arch/x86 defconfig patch. NAK on this
> route of patch propagation.
>
So you are fine with the patch contents, just not the title/subject
line. So if the subject line was:
[RESEND PATCH 1/3] x86 defconfig: set CONFIG_E1000E=y in x86 defconfigs
Would that have been alright?
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] e1000e: set CONFIG_E1000E=y in x86 ... , Jeff Kirsher , (Mon Jun 23, 4:14 pm)