Re: [patch 3/5] sctp: Make sure N * sizeof(union sctp_addr) does not overflow.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <gregkh@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <stable@...>, <jmforbes@...>, <zwane@...>, <tytso@...>, <rdunlap@...>, <davej@...>, <chuckw@...>, <reviews@...>, <mkrufky@...>, <cebbert@...>, <cavokz@...>, <w@...>, <rbranco@...>, <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, <alan@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 5:36 pm

From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:28:47 -0700


This one turned out to be a false alarm, and Vlad confirmed my
analysis today.  So there is no other SCTP patch you need to
wait for.

Thanks!
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/5] 2.6.25-stable review, Greg KH, (Sun Jun 22, 3:01 pm)
Re: [patch 0/5] 2.6.25-stable review, S.Çağlar, (Mon Jun 23, 7:19 am)
Re: [stable] [patch 0/5] 2.6.25-stable review, Greg KH, (Mon Jun 23, 3:30 pm)
Re: [patch 3/5] sctp: Make sure N * sizeof(union sctp_addr) ..., David Miller, (Mon Jun 23, 5:36 pm)
[patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Greg KH, (Sun Jun 22, 3:01 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Johannes Weiner, (Sun Jun 22, 4:22 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jun 22, 4:36 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 23, 4:09 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Bernhard Walle, (Mon Jun 23, 6:33 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 23, 6:53 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Bernhard Walle, (Mon Jun 23, 9:21 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Jun 22, 4:36 pm)