Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...>, <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...>, <linux-embedded@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 2:19 pm

On Monday 23 June 2008 19:45, Adrian Bunk wrote:

Well, I am not (and was not) disputing this. I agree with it.
CONFIGs should not be multiplying like rabbits.
--
vda
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., Denys Vlasenko, (Mon Jun 23, 2:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu..., (Fri May 2, 4:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger ..., Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu..., (Fri May 2, 4:33 pm)