Re: [PATCH -tip-rcu] Make rcutorture more vicious: make quiescent rcutorture less power-hungry

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Darren Hart
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 10:54 am

On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 13:17 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

I'm a little concerned about how this will affect real-time performance,
as queueing up lots of timers all at once can lead to long running timer
expiration handlers.  If just a schedule_timeout, I suppose we are only
looking at a process wakeup, as opposed to a softirq context callback
function?

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Real-Time Linux Team Lead
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Make rcutorture more vicious: add stutter feature, Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Jun 18, 5:21 am)
[PATCH] Make rcutorture more vicious: reinstate boot-time ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Jun 18, 9:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] Make rcutorture more vicious: reinstate boot-t ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Jun 19, 10:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH -tip-rcu] Make rcutorture more vicious: make qu ..., Darren Hart, (Mon Jun 23, 10:54 am)
Re: [PATCH -tip-rcu] Make rcutorture more vicious: make qu ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Jun 23, 11:07 am)
[PATCH -tip-rcu] Make rcutorture more vicious: invoke RCU ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Jun 25, 12:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH -tip-rcu] Make rcutorture more vicious: invoke ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Jun 26, 8:48 am)