Re: [RFC -mm 0/6] sysv ipc: scale msgmnb with the number of cpus

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...>
Cc: <Solofo.Ramangalahy@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Matt Helsley <matthltc@...>, Mingming Cao <cmm@...>, Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...>, Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 9:15 am

Hi Manfred,

This part is more difficult to answer than the other one:

Yes, while this is (still) possible, this can become cumbersome with
namespaces, hotplug, ...


This would probably mean one daemon per ipc namespace.
The patches seems lighter.

There has been related discussions regarding kernel
space vs. userspace approach in the threads:
. "Change in default vm_dirty_ratio"
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/18/471
. "[RFC][PATCH 0/6] Automatic kernel tunables (AKT)"
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/16
(and probably others)

So it seems there is no consensus in doing it either way: kernel or
user space.

Humm... now this make me think that you did not change the MSGMNB
value when you changed MSGMNI and MSGMAX.
Maybe that was on purpose?

-- 
solofo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC -mm 0/6] sysv ipc: scale msgmnb with the number of ..., , (Mon Jun 23, 9:15 am)