Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <benh@...>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <hpa@...>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 - 7:28 am

On Monday 23 June 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

There is no such #define for it.
And since zero is used for timer IRQs, it's not invalid.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, David Brownell, (Sun Jun 22, 10:53 pm)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Jun 23, 6:42 am)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, David Brownell, (Mon Jun 23, 7:28 am)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Jun 23, 4:06 pm)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, Alan Cox, (Mon Jun 23, 5:08 am)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, Johannes Stezenbach, (Mon Jun 23, 7:34 am)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, David Brownell, (Mon Jun 23, 7:29 am)
Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention, Alan Cox, (Mon Jun 23, 10:20 am)