* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> [2008-06-23 10:09]:

quoted text
> 
> | commit 91d48fc80f22817332170082e10de60a75851640
> | Author: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
> | Date:   Sun Jun 8 15:46:29 2008 +0200
> | CommitDate: Tue Jun 10 14:41:56 2008 +0200
> |
> |    bootmem: add return value to reserve_bootmem_node()
> |
> |    This patch changes the function reserve_bootmem_node() from void to
> |    int, returning -ENOMEM if the allocation fails.
> |
> |    Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
> |    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> 
> so it is a -stable candidate just as much as the kexec fix. (These are 
> all fixes for long-standing problems so i guess it can go all the way 
> back to all stable kernels that are being maintained.)

Ingo, 

shouldn't we add the reserve_bootmem_generic() fix [1] to 2.6.26-* at
least?


Bernhard

[1] 62b5ebe062c2801f6d40480ae3b91a64c8c8e6cb
-- 
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/