Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de> wrote:
[...]
quoted text
> @@ -941,6 +949,7 @@ static ide_startstop_t atapi_reset_pollfunc (ide_drive_t *drive)
>  	/* done polling */
>  	hwgroup->polling = 0;
>  	hwgroup->resetting = 0;

Actually, ->resetting needs to be protected by the ide_lock here.

[...]
quoted text
> @@ -1005,6 +1014,8 @@ static ide_startstop_t reset_pollfunc (ide_drive_t *drive)
>  	}
>  	hwgroup->polling = 0;	/* done polling */
>  	hwgroup->resetting = 0; /* done reset attempt */

Same as above.  Unless I have missed something, a simple

spin_lock(&ide_lock)

should suffice since there cannot possibly be another interrupt that
changes ->resetting behind our back.  I'll send an updated version of
patches 1 and 4 once I have your opinion on the current series.

Regards,

Elias
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/