Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ryan Hope <rmh3093@...>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>, <linux-mm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, June 22, 2008 - 10:29 pm

On Monday 23 June 2008 01:18, Ryan Hope wrote:

Hmm, nobody has reported such a hang with -mm yet, so maybe it
is another interaction in the patchset. OTOH, probably nobody
much uses -mm and reiser4, and reiser4 does lots of weird fiddling
with pagecache so it could be broken in -mm even.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 19, 4:12 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Jun 22, 11:07 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Nick Piggin, (Sun Jun 22, 10:29 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Jun 23, 9:05 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Jun 24, 11:32 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Jun 24, 12:12 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Jun 18, 5:28 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Jun 19, 8:05 pm)