Re: [patch 3/5] sctp: Make sure N * sizeof(union sctp_addr) does not overflow.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Sunday, June 22, 2008 - 12:23 pm

From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:01:36 -0700


Unfortunately, Vlad found another case in SCTP which has
an overflow bug similar to this one.  I'll work on a
fix for that today and submit.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/5] 2.6.25-stable review, Greg KH, (Sun Jun 22, 12:01 pm)
[patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Greg KH, (Sun Jun 22, 12:01 pm)
Re: [patch 3/5] sctp: Make sure N * sizeof(union sctp_addr ..., David Miller, (Sun Jun 22, 12:23 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Johannes Weiner, (Sun Jun 22, 1:22 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Jun 22, 1:36 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jun 22, 1:36 pm)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 23, 1:09 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Bernhard Walle, (Mon Jun 23, 3:33 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 23, 3:53 am)
Re: [patch 0/5] 2.6.25-stable review, S.Çağlar, (Mon Jun 23, 4:19 am)
Re: [patch 4/5] x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit, Bernhard Walle, (Mon Jun 23, 6:21 am)
Re: [stable] [patch 0/5] 2.6.25-stable review, Greg KH, (Mon Jun 23, 12:30 pm)