On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 19:02 -0700, Joel Becker wrote:I guess I don't quite see why all items don't have the ability to have children. I mean, a config_item has a config_item_type which contains the group_ops anyway; I don't quite see why the children, default_groups and subsys members from config_group don't live inside config_item and be done with it. In the kobject/kset case the separation makes sense as kobjects are embedded in things all over the kernel controlling things like ref counting, device model glue, hotplug info as well as the sysfs representation. The config_item doesn't have any responsibilities outside of the configfs representation (does it?) so the analogy isn't 100%. Though of course the item/group split makes sense if there are grander plans for the config_item in the future. Right Indeed, thx. --Ben. --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH 18/44 take 2] [UBI] build unit implementation |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Paul Jackson | [PATCH] cpuset sched_load_balance kmalloc fix |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
