Hi, On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:... It seems that some acpi calls are made before acpi is even initialized, hence the AE_BAD_PARAMETER (ACPI is trying to use uninitialized mutexes) -- I think that may be the source of the mutex corruption as well. This probably happens because acpi_early_init() (which happens before all the initcalls; mutex initialization too) returns early: void __init acpi_early_init(void) { acpi_status status = AE_OK; if (acpi_disabled) return; ... I notice that you're booting with acpi=off, so it might be the same problem. You could try this patch to find other callers that don't check whether ACPI is available before using ACPI-defined mutexes: diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index 235a138..5b34328 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c @@ -818,8 +818,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_wait_semaphore(acpi_handle handle, u32 u long jiffies; int ret = 0; - if (!sem || (units < 1)) - return AE_BAD_PARAMETER; + BUG_ON(!sem || (units < 1)); if (units > 1) return AE_SUPPORT; (This will dump the stack instead of printing AE_BAD_PARAMETER in your dmesg, so this is guaranteed to halt your machine given that you have at least three of these messages in your log already!) Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
