Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...>, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...>, linux kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@...>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2008 - 5:22 am

On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 23:52 -0700, Joel Becker wrote:

I've done a few things recently.  Haavard Skinnemoen has got an
out-of-tree, avr32-specific gpio interface [1] which I first converted
to the generic gpio framework then completely re-wrote.  Both use
configfs but before either version could reach completion they were
obsoleted by David Brownell's gpio sysfs interface.

A version of my gpio-dev interface is attached.  Bear in mind it was
never completed, it's full of known bugs but hey, might be useful for
you anyway :-)

At the moment I'm experimenting with configfs for pinmux control on
AVR32 SoCs.  There's really nothing to see there yet, it's all just
dicking about atm.


np, will do :-)

	--Ben.


[1]
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hskinnemoen/avr32-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/avr3...
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Sun Jun 8, 5:25 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for con..., Ben Nizette, (Fri Jun 20, 5:22 am)
Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Tue Jun 10, 4:12 am)