Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ben Nizette <bn@...>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...>, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...>, linux kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@...>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2008 - 2:52 am

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:19:10PM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:

	Excellent.  What is your stuff, btw?  Got code?  Love to see it.


	Yeah, I like this better than ERR_PTR.
	If you like the macros, I'll try to make the next merge window
as well.  So let me know.

joel

-- 

"I almost ran over an angel
 He had a nice big fat cigar.
 'In a sense,' he said, 'You're alone here
 So if you jump, you'd best jump far.'"

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Sun Jun 8, 5:25 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for con..., Joel Becker, (Fri Jun 20, 2:52 am)
Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Tue Jun 10, 4:12 am)