Andy Whitcroft wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:27:47AM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
>   
>> After running some of the libhugetlbfs tests the value for
>> /proc/meminfo/HugePages_Rsvd becomes really large.  It looks like it has
>> wrapped backwards from zero.
>> Below is the sequence I used to run one of the tests that causes this;
>> the tests passes for what it is intended to test but leaves a large
>> value for reserved pages and that seemed strange to me.
>> test run on ppc64 with 16M huge pages
>>     
>
> Yes Adam reported that here yesterday, he found it in his hugetlfs testing.
> I have done some investigation on it and it is being triggered by a bug in
> the private reservation tracking patches.  It is triggered by the hugetlb
> test which causes some complex vma splits to occur on a private mapping.
>   
sorry I missed that

quoted text
> I believe I have the underlying problem nailed and do have some nearly
> complete patches for this and they should be in a postable state by
> tommorrow.
>   
Cool.
quoted text
> -apw
>   
Jon

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/